Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Really depends on what your application. For the most part software raid will beat cheap hardware raid in preformance and relyability/recoverability, if we are talking modern hardware. If your looking for a dedicated nas box I would suggest looking into sun's zfs. I've been researching it for a couple months now for a project and its quite a nice package, easy but powerful. Problem is it doesn't have native support in linux, due to licenssing incompatability. It is available through fuse. However if your looking for a dedicated box opensolaris, or bsd offer better preformace and more features, due to native support in the kernel. If your just looking for preformance on an existing system then investing in a good 3ware card, or something similar may be the way to go. But you can put together a basic, consumer grade, nas box with opennas (bsd) or eonas (solaris), for about the same as a comercial grade raid card. ------Original Message------ From: Stephen Adler Sender: discuss-bounces-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org To: BLU Subject: Setting up a raid disk array Sent: Oct 3, 2009 2:29 PM Guys, I'm thinking of setting up a raid array and usually I just use the software raid tools linux provides. But I'm wondering what the advantages would be to use the hardware raid controller. Any preference out there between using the software or hardware raid? Cheers. Steve. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss Sent from my BlackBerry? smartphone with SprintSpeed
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |