Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:50:14 -0400 From: David Hummel <lemmuh-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 5:29 AM, Randy Cole <randyokc-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org> wrote: > I am very disappointed with the Ubuntu upgrade process this time. > After attempting to perform a distribution upgrade, I find it would be > much faster to download the CD using bittorrent. I think you're complaining about network performance, not the upgrade process (which btw is one of the most seamless out there). Especially if you're using the default mirrors, which were very busy due to the release yesterday... If you have multiple local systems and a relatively slow network connection, having to download everything is very inefficient. I have two machines running OpenSUSE, and rather than use online update I download everything and use smart to install things. (I'm surely downloading far more data than I would by pointing at the remote repositories -- but the way I do it does all the downloading overnight, so it takes much less of my time.) -- Robert Krawitz <rlk-FrUbXkNCsVf2fBVCVOL8/A at public.gmane.org> Tall Clubs International -- http://www.tall.org/ or 1-888-IM-TALL-2 Member of the League for Programming Freedom -- http://ProgFree.org Project lead for Gutenprint -- http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net "Linux doesn't dictate how I work, I dictate how Linux works." --Eric Crampton
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |