Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
jbk wrote: > I have allocated distinct partitions that I rotate between distro > versions. So in the past I would carefully recreate each user in the > new version paying attention to matching each UID and GID exactly, > copy the users home to the new home preserving date and ownership of > files. > > This is a cumbersome and time consuming process. Do you find that things break frequently enough to necessitate this? Your approach doesn't seem unusual for Fedora users, and I wonder why. On machines where I run Debian and Ubuntu, I install when the hardware is first deployed, and then do updates from that point forward for the life of the hardware. > The Fedora Distro is installed along with a virtual machine tailored > to each of the users needs. > ...I want to make sure that most things work. Given that you are using a VM, can't you archive the current F10 VM for each user, then update it to F11 and F12, and simply roll back to the F10 version if a problem is encountered? Updating the host is more risky, as it'll impact the ability to run the VM guests, but it should also be a simpler setup with fewer dependencies on things like X that would be more prone to breakage across updates. Using a long-term OS like RHEL or CentOS might be a better choice for the host. -Tom -- Tom Metro Venture Logic, Newton, MA, USA "Enterprise solutions through open source." Professional Profile: http://tmetro.venturelogic.com/
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |