Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Thu, 2010-01-21 at 15:08 +0000, jay-R5TnC2l8y5lBDgjK7y7TUQ at public.gmane.org wrote: > I believe vmware server would make a difference. Xen is great for unix servers, but vmware server is designed for your situation. The modified kernels and other optimizations that vmware can offer should beat out xen, for running xp. If open source is the goal you could try virtual box, but you'll still have issues if the problems lie in rdp. > I have done side-by-side comparisons on this, xen -vs- virtualbox -vs- vmware server, and I hate to admit it but vmware-server ran rings around the rest. I was running 5 virtual machines simultaneously and needed then to all allow 'as needed' disk allocation growth (running a mysql-cluster in the vm for node failover testing). vmware server prove the most efficient, the most manageable, and the easiest to reconfigure on the fly. IT may not be the same as you running 32 windows XP virtual machines, but pound for pound the vmware-server out performed everything else. I will say though that its 'hypervisor' attempt ( a web browser based management interface for the vm server) is pretty clunky, and was obviously written by geeks for geeks with no attempt to make it look good. However, it is functional and I suspect that is all they cared about. Richard > ------Original Message------ > From: Ryan Pugatch > Sender: discuss-bounces-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org > To: Ryan Pugatch > To: BLU > Subject: Re: virtualizing XP under Linux and remote IE testing > Sent: Jan 21, 2010 9:42 AM > > Dan Ritter wrote: > > > > 32 XP VMs on one machine. Hrm. How many CPUs does the host have? > > How are the CPU loads? What kind of disk system? How are the I/O loads? > > How much RAM? Is there any swapping? > > > > Half of my devs use Macs, and half use Linux; when we need to test IE, > > we either walk over to Windows desktops that don't do anything else or > > VNC into them. We don't need 32 of them, though. > > > > -dsr- > > > > > The box has two quad core cpus and 32GB RAM. I/O and RAM is fine. Xen > is not performing well and chews up CPU. That is definitely an issue. > > We're too large to just have a few desktops scattered around, unfortunately. > > To answer other questions, we can't use WINE or Crossover nor can we use > any of those other solutions as we're required to test true IE under XP. > > VMWare has been something I have been thinking of trying. We definitely > want to avoid having to run the VMs locally, though. > > Thanks, > Ryan > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > > > Sent from my BlackBerry? smartphone with SprintSpeed > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |