Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Feb 13, 2010, at 11:06 PM, Shankar Viswanathan wrote: > > There are security reasons why certain OEMs disable VT-x/AMD-V in the > BIOS -- search for "Blue Pill" to see the gory details. While this > hole has been demonstrated, I am not aware of any public exploits > (perhaps because it is quite hard to create the necessary conditions). > Still, disabling the extensions if you do not plan to use them is > probably a good idea (my personal opinion, not my employer's). I'm aware of Blue Pill. I'm also aware that the claim of 100% undetectability is impossible on the x86 architecture. Short version: there are privileged x86 instructions that aren't handled by VT-x/AMD-v. Those instructions can be used to determine if the OS is running in a virtualized environment or not. --Rich P.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |