Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On 02/25/2010 06:36 PM, Bill Horne wrote: > On 2/25/2010 3:31 PM, Chris O'Connell wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > > I've recently taken over the IT department of a non profit organizati= on. > > I've found that most users have a printer on their desk, but no two > > printers are the same. I would like to standardize on one > > model/manufacturer if possible for a few reasons, the most major > reason is > > the ability to order mostly the same types of ink cartridges. > > > Can anyone make any recommendations regarding specific models or make= s > based > > on reliability? > > I recommend a three step process: > > 1. Find out how much paper they've purchased in the past quarter (a > year is better), and calculate the number of pages printed per da= y. > 2. Determine the cost difference between laserjet and inkjet, using > current costs for supplies. > 3. Present the manager(s) with options for both machines, including > the break-even date for buying one or two laserjets. > > There are advantages to using centrally-served printers: > > 1. Much better accountability: a print server will gather > statistics on pages printed _per user_, and identify users who > use the most resources. > 2. Greatly increased reliability. Most Inkjets are disposable > devices, not intended for repair. > 3. Improved time-use efficiencies: laserjets are much faster > printers, and that translates into dramatic savings when > employees are waiting for inkjets to finish jobs. > > HTH. > > Bill Horne Yes, but one thing you still have to take into account is the people. _______________ --=20 Jerry Feldman <gaf-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org> Boston Linux and Unix PGP key id: 537C5846 PGP Key fingerprint: 3D1B 8377 A3C0 A5F2 ECBB CA3B 4607 4319 537C 5846
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |