BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Some Android questions
- Subject: Some Android questions
- From: gaf-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org (Jerry Feldman)
- Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 07:48:00 -0500
- In-reply-to: <000901cab8db$77e315c0$67a94140$@net>
- References: <4B8171A4.8080701@blu.org> <4B8573C5.3080007@gmail.com> <4B858B86.1090409@blu.org> <704e63341002280506l2a1925fat103af36f59687e39@mail.gmail.com> <000001cab896$10e5eef0$32b1ccd0$@net> <222564.96881.qm@web113909.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <004701cab89d$8fb54bc0$af1fe340$@net> <6b2fb07e1002281356oac3f1ffuae51d0499a57a791@mail.gmail.com> <000901cab8db$77e315c0$67a94140$@net>
Good discussion, got me thinking.For my purposes, I think that I will still go out and buy an Android since it does meet my criteria and the Android users I know like it. But there is a lot happening in the embedded space right now. With Nokia and Intel collaborating on Meego, and other stuff, technology will continue to move ahead. On 02/28/2010 08:06 PM, Anthony Gabrielson wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > From: discuss-bounces-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org [mailto:discuss-bounces-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org] On Behal= f Of > Doug > Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2010 4:57 PM > To: discuss-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org > Subject: Re: Some Android questions > > Hello Anthony: > > I am far more bothered by the "Apps Store" way of delivering software > that must be approved. They are making sure there store is "clean", > removing R rated apps. It is not a platform I think I can tinker with > since somewhere I need to get approval from Apple. Maybe that process > is not that difficult, but I would go bonkers waiting even a day to > get software I wrote on a device I own. > > Doug > > > Hi Doug, > That really wasn't what I was referring to; I think the iTunes type > store is pretty cool and a good idea. My gripes are a bit more fundame= ntal. > I think the kernel (the core of the OS) needs to be thought out, unders= tood, > and prepared for future problems - kernels are much to complicated to e= xpect > anything less. I don't think Google is ready for that; and I won't eve= n > considering one until there are. I think they have developed a really = nice > one off device, but they haven't seemed to follow any of the structure > needed for software that is going to get the face time its going to get= =2E > > =20 --=20 Jerry Feldman <gaf-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org> Boston Linux and Unix PGP key id: 537C5846 PGP Key fingerprint: 3D1B 8377 A3C0 A5F2 ECBB CA3B 4607 4319 537C 5846
- Prev by Date: What do you use for apache log statistics
- Next by Date: Some Android questions
- Previous by thread: Some Android questions
- Next by thread: Some Android questions
- Index(es):