BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
DYNDNS SERVICES Email, Mailhop, Etc...
- Subject: DYNDNS SERVICES Email, Mailhop, Etc...
- From: me-5yx05kfkO/aqeI1yJSURBw at public.gmane.org (Matthew Gillen)
- Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 21:23:15 -0500
- In-reply-to: <4B905C97.1070105-SkCWf5sxpj0sV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org>
- References: <4B905C97.1070105@mail2.gis.net>
On 3/4/2010 8:21 PM, jbk wrote: > I sent the following to dyndns and at the end of this > message is the reply I received from on of the sales Reps. > I then left a message to call me because their reply > addressed only one of my concerns. > > I need to know the total picture. What will the recipients > of the the mailhop see as the reply to address. I don't want > the mailhop address to be the reply to address. Will the > mailhop cause problems with my recipients ISP? > > So is there any experience that the blu members have that > they could expound on here? Anti-spam measures are your enemy. The reply-to isn't your problem. Using mailhop outbound, you'll get bitten by SPF: your mailhop won't be on your ISP's list of allowed servers, and your mail will go into most domains' bit-bucket. For twice as much you could use the mailhop inbound to forward to a mail server in your house (potentially on a high-numbered port), which is configured to forward everything to your ISP's mail server (in sendmail parlance, that's the 'smarthost' configuration). But that requires a mail server in your house to be up 24x7, which may or may not be a problem for you. Matt
- References:
- DYNDNS SERVICES Email, Mailhop, Etc...
- From: jbk-SkCWf5sxpj0sV2N9l4h3zg at public.gmane.org (jbk)
- DYNDNS SERVICES Email, Mailhop, Etc...
- Prev by Date: DYNDNS SERVICES Email, Mailhop, Etc...
- Next by Date: DYNDNS SERVICES Email, Mailhop, Etc...
- Previous by thread: DYNDNS SERVICES Email, Mailhop, Etc...
- Next by thread: DYNDNS SERVICES Email, Mailhop, Etc...
- Index(es):