BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reminder -- RAID 5 is not your friend
- Subject: Reminder -- RAID 5 is not your friend
- From: richard.pieri-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org (Richard Pieri)
- Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:55:29 -0500
- In-reply-to: <sjmvdd2py1c.fsf-rCjn+dgJx7nFHB7ageuUnw@public.gmane.org>
- References: <20100311042755.GO14999@tao.merseine.nu> <67A567B1-63E9-45D2-BDB1-2A204BC692AD@gmail.com> <sjmvdd2py1c.fsf@pgpdev.ihtfp.org>
On Mar 11, 2010, at 12:29 PM, Derek Atkins wrote: > > In fact, if you lose the *right* set of disks you can lose 50% of your > disks in RAID10 and still not lose your data. :-D I don't consider a 1 in 2 chance of data loss to be "reliable". And technically, that chance decreases with the size of N. With 20-disk RAID 1 or RAID 10 set (N=10), the chance of a second disk failure taking out the entire set is 1 in 10. Meanwhile, the probability of the first failure in the set goes up with the number of disks in the set so it isn't a nice, simple line. --Rich P.
- References:
- Reminder -- RAID 5 is not your friend
- From: dsr-mzpnVDyJpH4k7aNtvndDlA at public.gmane.org (Dan Ritter)
- Reminder -- RAID 5 is not your friend
- From: richard.pieri-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org (Richard Pieri)
- Reminder -- RAID 5 is not your friend
- From: warlord-DPNOqEs/LNQ at public.gmane.org (Derek Atkins)
- Reminder -- RAID 5 is not your friend
- Prev by Date: Reminder -- RAID 5 is not your friend
- Next by Date: Reminder -- RAID 5 is not your friend
- Previous by thread: Reminder -- RAID 5 is not your friend
- Next by thread: Reminder -- RAID 5 is not your friend
- Index(es):