BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Drive disposal
- Subject: Drive disposal
- From: gaf-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org (Jerry Feldman)
- Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:02:25 -0400
- In-reply-to: <A4C1B006DAFFA847951A7642E3E6979B055E3D0DDD-ECgVUCs3bJE/Q/Mj1aAjxjvvJXYVMs1G@public.gmane.org>
- References: <1602250811-1269275201-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1130137458-@bda309.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> <4BA7A3DA.70900@speakeasy.net> <A4C1B006DAFFA847951A7642E3E6979B055E3D0DDD@prdmail02.postscript.int>
Just a quick check of web sites, I found this site: http://www.garner-products.com/hipaa-home.htm "Hard drives that are non-operational still retain information on the disc platter. Degaussing magnetically erases all of the information contained on the disc platter, thereby making the hard drive safe for disposal". I would certainly double check the relevant HIPAA regulations. On 03/22/2010 01:25 PM, Chandler, Scott wrote: > Hi Bill, > > Securely wiping "good" drives is acceptable under the right circumstanc= es (method, number of passes) but when it comes to data which falls under= HIPAA regulations, a certificate of disposal (destruction) from a reputa= ble company is a nice "get out of jail free" card. > > The larger problem is drives which are "dead". They won't spin up or ma= ke that tell tale clunking sound. You still need to destroy them properly= =2E > > My understanding is that degaussing alone is not acceptable. > > Scott > > -----Original Message----- > From: discuss-bounces-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org [mailto:discuss-bounces-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org] On Behal= f Of Bill Horne > Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 1:08 PM > To: BLU Discussion List > Subject: Re: Drive disposal > > On 3/22/2010 12:27 PM, jay-R5TnC2l8y5lBDgjK7y7TUQ at public.gmane.org wrote: > =20 >> I've started looking into some low volume drive disposal, and was curi= ous what options others use. My main requirments are: >> >> 1. Reasonable for low volume, 25- 50 drives every 6 months I would gue= ss. >> >> 2. Provide cerification that will pass hipaa requirments. Basically c= hain of custody, degausing and shreding. We deal with a lot of pharma co= mpanies, and would like to use similar standards. >> >> 3. Resonably local, and allow drop off or local pick up options. >> >> My searching online has turned up SEM out of westboro, that meets all = these. And their site quotes a rate of $5 a drive for lots of 26-100.=20 >> >> Anyone have any advice on companies and costs? >> >> >> =20 >> =20 > If you're talking about drives that are still usable, you might do > better with organizations or individuals (I'm one) who recycle machines= > for low-income users. If HIPAA allows for the "secure erasure" of > drives, then you could save at least some of the recycling cost by > donating drives to these places. > > Bill > > > =20 --=20 Jerry Feldman <gaf-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org> Boston Linux and Unix PGP key id: 537C5846 PGP Key fingerprint: 3D1B 8377 A3C0 A5F2 ECBB CA3B 4607 4319 537C 5846
- References:
- Drive disposal
- From: jay-R5TnC2l8y5lBDgjK7y7TUQ at public.gmane.org (jay-R5TnC2l8y5lBDgjK7y7TUQ at public.gmane.org)
- Drive disposal
- From: ehorne-zY4eFNvK5D9If6P1QZMOBw at public.gmane.org (Bill Horne)
- Drive disposal
- From: Scott.Chandler-VQAUrahS1b5BDgjK7y7TUQ at public.gmane.org (Chandler, Scott)
- Drive disposal
- Prev by Date: Drive disposal
- Next by Date: Android Backflip summary
- Previous by thread: Drive disposal
- Next by thread: Drive disposal
- Index(es):