BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
iPad
- Subject: iPad
- From: jarod-ajLrJawYSntWk0Htik3J/w at public.gmane.org (Jarod Wilson)
- Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 01:17:25 -0400
- In-reply-to: <4BC3CED4.2070600-vYTEC60ixJUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
- References: <000001cad676$572d44f0$0587ced0$@com> <AE128142-C200-479D-B0A5-FED01CCFF2CA@gmail.com> <1270959569.11367.0.camel@delen> <20100411175408.GJ14101@collab.or8.net> <4BC21773.7070408@speakeasy.net> <61F4E458-B490-4B7F-A303-E3D863421C0F@gmail.com> <20100411194302.GT23434@tao.merseine.nu> <4BC3BBA1.9060508@buttery.org> <4BC3CAC8.6080607@hkl.hms.harvard.edu> <4BC3CED4.2070600@linux.com>
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Ryan Pugatch <rpug-vYTEC60ixJUAvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org> wrote: > Ian Stokes-Rees wrote: > >> >> * I should note that the hardware has not lived up to 60+ hours of use a >> week, which perhaps isn't surprising given that they aren't billed as >> "enterprise" grade, but is surprising given how much design effort (and >> consequent cost) goes into Apple hardware. ?I've had the optical drive >> die on me, the screen has lost a vertical column, and tomorrow I get my >> third logic board, plus new power supply, plus apparently both my >> batteries are mal functionioning ... > > I'd say that at $WORK we've experienced more failures with MacBook Pros > than our Latitude D and E series laptops. My own 17" MacBook Pro is only 6 or 7 months old, but it easily logs 70+ hours a week, haven't had to replace a thing. I've got a 5+ year old PowerBook G4 that is still rock-solid, haven't ever had to replace anything in it due to failure or malfunction (I did replace the original 80GB hard drive with a 320GB one a year or two ago). I've got a PowerMac G4 tower that is over 8 years old, still going strong, only thing I've ever had to do with it was put down a new layer of thermal grease under the heatsink about 2 years ago (and it runs 24x7, providing assorted services on my home network). Not than any of my non-Mac stuff is at all fragile though (but unfortunately, one of my only 32-bit systems I actually still liked, a dual PIII/800 on an Asus P2B-DS seems to have up and died for some reason I've not cared enough to diagnose yet). Sure, my ThinkPad T61 is perhaps a bit more "rugged" feeling than my MacBook Pro, given that its got a bulkier plastic case, a hideous off-center bezel around the screen, etc., but I like using the MBP much much better. I'm sure there's a good analogy between a luxury sedan and an economy sedan that fits here, use your imagination... :) I spend all day trying to fix a myriad of things that are broken in Linux (specifically, the kernel). So like Rich, when I get home at night, I want my computers to Just Work. Just because that role is most often filled by Apple hardware and Mac OS X doesn't mean I can't have my cake and eat it too. It *is* still unix, so a good chunk of the stuff that runs on Linux runs on Mac OS X too. And I've still got plenty of boxes running Linux, and can have more things to hack on than I've got time to hack, so I definitely don't feel like Apple is taking away any liberties from me, I feel like they're giving me something that I can use and rely on to always be functional. Definitely can't say that about a machine running Linux if you come even close to tracking the upstream kernel and several other upstream userspace projects (particularly a laptop, where I kind of like it when suspend and resume actually works 100% of the time). Of course, this thread was about the iPad, not Mac OS X, and the iPad is a very different beast. But I don't have time to care about hacking on a tablet device. If I'm going to get one, I just wanna use the damned thing and have it work reliably. "But if its open, you can fix problems yourself!" See prior statement: I spend enough time during the day fixing broken crap, I shouldn't have to need to fix what I view as a computing appliance when I come home at night. Anyone else seen the reviews done on the JooJoo tablet? The thing is a joke. I'm rather doubtful anyone else is going to suddenly churn out something that isn't a steaming pile any time soon too. I forget which of the big manufacturers it was (Asus, iirc), but one said more or less "we plan to release several tablets in the coming months, probably based on either Android or Chrome OS, and probably a Windows 7 version". That's inspiring. I'm sure it'll be fantastic if you don't even know what software is going to be running on it. The software running on it *is the most important part*. The aforementioned JooJoo reviews mention that the hardware is actually quite good. Its the horrid software that makes the thing a dud. I remain underwhelmed by anything I've seen running on an Android phone. Chrome OS isn't released yet. Windows 7 is, well, a Microsoft product, so if you have problems with Apple, hard to see how Windows would be a better alternative for a tablet, performance and usability issues aside. /me done stoking for now... -- Jarod Wilson jarod-ajLrJawYSntWk0Htik3J/w at public.gmane.org
- References:
- iPad
- From: blu-Z8efaSeK1ezqlBn2x/YWAg at public.gmane.org (Edward Ned Harvey)
- iPad
- From: richard.pieri-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org (Richard Pieri)
- iPad
- From: doctormo-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org (Martin Owens)
- iPad
- From: bene-Gk2boCrsRs1AfugRpC6u6w at public.gmane.org (Ben Eisenbraun)
- iPad
- From: ehorne-zY4eFNvK5D9If6P1QZMOBw at public.gmane.org (Bill Horne)
- iPad
- From: richard.pieri-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org (Richard Pieri)
- iPad
- From: dsr-mzpnVDyJpH4k7aNtvndDlA at public.gmane.org (Dan Ritter)
- iPad
- From: mark-OGhnF3Lt4opAfugRpC6u6w at public.gmane.org (Mark J Dulcey)
- iPad
- From: ijstokes-/2FeUQLD3jedFdvTe/nMLpVzexx5G7lz at public.gmane.org (Ian Stokes-Rees)
- iPad
- From: rpug-vYTEC60ixJUAvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org (Ryan Pugatch)
- iPad
- Prev by Date: cpu core counts (was: iPad)
- Next by Date: Recommendations for rss/news reader
- Previous by thread: iPad
- Next by thread: iPad
- Index(es):