BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Notes on VirtualBox
- Subject: Notes on VirtualBox
- From: gaf-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org (Jerry Feldman)
- Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 07:42:45 -0400
- In-reply-to: <4BCBCBBB.5030100-prQxUZoa2zOsTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org>
- References: <37924.192.168.2.251.1271615211.squirrel@envoy.ci.net> <4BCBCBBB.5030100@darose.net>
On 04/18/2010 11:19 PM, David Rosenstrauch wrote: > On 04/18/2010 02:26 PM, Rich Braun wrote: > =20 >> Would love to hear others' comments. >> >> -rich >> =20 > Yup. I've been using VB for several years now and have similarly found= =20 > it to be excellent. > > > I haven't used VMWare in anger in a long time. But when I did have to = > use it (VMW Player) recently, the things that stood out to me about it = > that was very inferior to VB was a) the closed source aspect of it, and= =20 > b) the installation process. > > Since it's closed source, there's obviously no package for it available= =20 > via my distro. And installation basically consisted of letting the=20 > installer - running as root, mind you! - do whatever it wanted to my sy= stem. > > At best, my package manager had no knowledge of which files it=20 > installed, which is annoying. At worst, the installer could have=20 > completely hosed my system, compromised its security, etc., and I would= =20 > have had no idea what it did, or why, and so no idea how to fix it. > > I put up with such things under Windows, but I refuse to do so under=20 > Linux - especially when there's an open source app with the same=20 > functionality that works as good (if not better). > > =20 I've been using VirtualBox for a long time. Recently, I've had a problem running a 64-bit guest OS on VBox 3.1.6 as it tells me that my processor's virtual assist is disabled although it is enabled in the BIOS. I recently installed QEMU with KVM, and QEMU/KVM did work, but with no sound from the GUI. I deinstalled QEMU, and reinstalled VBox, and when I saw this email, I was able to boot a 64-bit guest OS. I found that for a desktop VMM, Virtualbox and QEMU/KVM perform better than VMWare Workstation, but as a caveat I have not personally benchmarked VMWare for a few years. Currently I have Ubuntu 9.10 x86_64 and Windows XP (32-bit) running simultaneously both have sound. One annoyance with QEMU/KVM was that it always prompted for root access although there is probably a solution for that. VirtualBox uses 'vboxusers' as a group. Both KVM and QEMU have entries in /etc/group. BTW: VBox also comes with several utilities such as the ability to convert a VBox .vdi file to a KVM image file. --=20 Jerry Feldman <gaf-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org> Boston Linux and Unix PGP key id: 537C5846 PGP Key fingerprint: 3D1B 8377 A3C0 A5F2 ECBB CA3B 4607 4319 537C 5846
- References:
- Notes on VirtualBox
- From: richb-RBmg6HWzfGThzJAekONQAQ at public.gmane.org (Rich Braun)
- Notes on VirtualBox
- From: darose-prQxUZoa2zOsTnJN9+BGXg at public.gmane.org (David Rosenstrauch)
- Notes on VirtualBox
- Prev by Date: Ubuntu and safe web surfing?
- Next by Date: Ubuntu and safe web surfing?
- Previous by thread: Notes on VirtualBox
- Next by thread: Ubuntu and safe web surfing?
- Index(es):