![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 08:11:40PM -0400, Edward Ned Harvey wrote: > Phew ... it's really unfortunate that you have a preference for Linux as a > NAS. Because it's certainly not the best solution, unless you have some > really specific linux-only application, or something like that. Say, not having any other Solaris machines around. That might be an issue. > In terms of performance, reliability, speed, backups, and every > characteristic that I can basically think of mattering in a NAS, I would say > solaris/opensolaris/ZFS would be the better solution. It's probably also useful to look through Chris Siebenmann's blog on his experiences with a large ZFS installation: http://utcc.utoronto.ca/~cks/space/blog/solaris/ -dsr-
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |