Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
have you tried cmake? On 06/05/2010 10:56 AM, Mark Woodward wrote: > Here's my problem: > > I'm old. I'm set in my ways. I have a LOT of code that has accumulated > over my career and stored in libraries that I use for various projects > from time to time. > > Most of the code is pretty good, I think, some of it is crap that works > or mostly works. It builds on almost any platform with a little tweaking > from time to time. Subsets of this code have been used on embedded x86 > projects, embedded Linux ARM, MIPS, PowerPC, Windows, solaris, Linux (of > course). You get the picture. To accomplish this, I have some pretty > elaborate make files. Every 5 or so years, I attempt to refactor the > make system, and never quite get there. the automake stuff is such a > PITA I spend a day or so on it and get frustrated. > > I'm getting a little tired with the vi/make/gdb paradigm. It is getting > laborious. With bigger monitors and more screen real estate, IDE's are > starting to make more sense. The problem, none of the IDEs I have looked > at support external projects very well. Unless you use their project and > make system, the IDE is reduced to an MDI editor and a way to run make. > You don't get any of the benefit of the tags and stuff. > > Sure, I can add this crap to my make files, but jeez, then why bother > with the ide in the first place? > > Anyone have any suggestions? Want to share your your misery? > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > >
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |