![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Tom Metro wrote: > > The FSF might find it more efficient to address this problem using a > carrot approach rather than a stick approach. For example, creating a > "GPL Compliant" trademark logo, and licensing it to companies that use > GPL licensed components in their products, contingent upon them > complying with the terms of the license. > > (Of course a company could use the badge in violation of the terms, and > the FSF would be back in the same boat needing to sue them. Though > perhaps that'd be a more obvious and cheaper case to prosecute.) If the company believes that it is in compliance with the GPL, then its defense against a trademark-plus-copyright suit would be exactly the same as its defense against a copyright suit.
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |