BLU Discuss list archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

best practices using LVM and e2fsck

Subject: best practices using LVM and e2fsck
From: solaris2-Z8efaSeK1ezqlBn2x/YWAg at public.gmane.org (Edward Ned Harvey)
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 09:48:07 -0400
In-reply-to: <4C2B95B1.1050606-5a1Jt6qxUNc@public.gmane.org>
References: <10B70046B6BA4EEABFE45C40142FA2E0@dnanet.mit.edu> <001601cb172b$5d83ea70$188bbf50$@com> <20100629213222.GM7359@dragontoe.org> <000e01cb1872$4a545410$defcfc30$@com> <4C2B95B1.1050606@vl.com>

> From: Tom Metro [mailto:tmetro-blu-5a1Jt6qxUNc at public.gmane.org]
> 
> With Linux software RAID you can actually reduce the priority of the
> process performing the "scrub" so that the performance impact is not
> noticeable. Perhaps the same can be done with ZFS.

This is currently being worked on.  It's not available yet.

Prev by Date: best practices using LVM and e2fsck
Next by Date: best practices using LVM and e2fsck
Previous by thread: best practices using LVM and e2fsck- thanks for your input
Next by thread: best practices using LVM and e2fsck
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread


BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org