Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Derek Martin <invalid-yPs96gJSFQo51KKgMmcfiw at public.gmane.org> wrote: > Let me make myself clear: mbox DOES NOT suck. ?Just every > implementation of it that exists does. If every implementation of it that exists sucks, then pardon, but wtf is the point of arguing how superior it is? I didn't bother to read beyond the above quoted bit, because to me, the proof is in the available-for-people-to-actually-use pudding. Being theoretically better is hardly useful for someone asking for advice on what to implement *today*. Finish writing an implementation that doesn't suck, then people might be more willing to listen. -- Jarod Wilson jarod-ajLrJawYSntWk0Htik3J/w at public.gmane.org
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |