![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 22:04 -0400, Matthew Gillen wrote: > On 08/02/2010 07:59 PM, Dan Ritter wrote: > > http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.kernel.obscure.html > > > > excerpt: > > > > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_tw_recycle > > > > Enable fast recycling TIME-WAIT sockets. Default value is 1. > > It should not be changed without advice/request of technical > > experts. > > > > Nevertheless, it seems to be set to zero by default on most > > distros. > > > > Hrm. Warrants further investigation. > > Indeed. A little more digging turned up this: > > http://www.speedguide.net/read_articles.php?id=121 > -------------------------------------- > TCP_TW_RECYCLE > It enables fast recycling of TIME_WAIT sockets. The default value is 0 > (disabled). The sysctl documentation incorrectly states the default as > enabled. It can be changed to 1 (enabled) in many cases. Known to cause some > issues with hoststated (load balancing and fail over) if enabled, should be > used with caution. > > echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_tw_recycle > (boolean, default: 0) > -------------------------------------- > > It always surprises me how little documentation there is for many kernel > parameters... > Me too ... I have been at this for a full man-day now and read till my eyes bled. All that I can find out is that the use of recycling can have adverse effects on NATing due to the timestamp mechanisms, when using PAWS .... not very informative. Given all that, I am going to embark on a huge set of testing, stressing and maxing out hte server and see if anything breaks. In the end I guess in lieu of experiential wisdom I am gong to have to go with the trusty old timer : Empirical data :) I will let the list know how it turns out. Thanks for the responses Richard > Matt > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |