Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Eric Chadbourne wrote: > Slightly off topic, but when somebody mentioned the "Apple way of doing > things" ?, it reminded me of a family member. They had a wintel. > Totally screwed it up. Went from computer to virus collection to door > stop. Then they got a Mac. It seems to be more efficient than the > wintel as it's skipping the viruses and going straight to door stop. I > took a quick look at it and they had executables all over the place. > Sometimes duplicate versions of programs in different places. It's the > prettiest heat producer in the house. I guess my point is it's the > person and not so much the machine. > > Eric C. - the one who's computer and phone run Linux! ... And it has been ever thus. Even back when I had a Mac SE 30 on my desk with an external 30MB hard drives, I would get messages like "ERROR -40". Why couldn't they focus on better error messages and troubleshooting rather than getting the screen saver's fish to swim across both monitors? Because they want to hide as many details as possible. That is their way. Locked-down systems generally stay trouble-free longer. Macs are, in general, much more trouble-free. However, once they get messed up, there's no knowing how to fix it. I assume that's much better now that it's POSIX under the covers, but I don't know. With Windows, you got much more helpful error messages (because they weren't trying to hide the details to the same extent), but you get them much more often.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |