Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Edward Ned Harvey <blu-Z8efaSeK1ezqlBn2x/YWAg at public.gmane.org> wrote: >> From: discuss-bounces-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org [mailto:discuss-bounces-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org] On >> Behalf Of Jarod Wilson >> >> > >> > For *hardware* it does not work well. ?They require RHEL because they >> paid >> > RedHat to develop something proprietary >> >> Huh? Says who? News to me. And I work here. Pretty sure you're >> incorrect there. Red Hat doesn't do proprietary software development >> for *anyone*. The software in question is more likely written by Dell >> themselves. No clue how they're enforcing use only with RHEL though. > > I went down this road before, extensively, and 100% certain. ?I had centos > installed on a dell server with perc controller. ?I copied the > redhat-release file from a legitimate and supposedly equivalent rhel > installation. ?I tried to install OMSA. ?It wasn't working - kept choking > with some sort of library improperly linked or something like that ... ?I > called Dell support, and we worked on it together for some hours. > > The conclusion was, some package (I forget the name now, it's been a few > years) in centos is the "free alternative" to something that's included in > RHEL. ?It's not the same, and it doesn't work. I'm sorry, but I still don't buy that it was Red Hat shipping something CentOS can't. Its entirely possible CentOS built some library *incorrectly*, but everything shipped in RHEL on the distribution discs is 100% open-source, modulo binary firmware. The *only* thing CentOS is required to change are the trademarked Red Hat bits, like artwork, name, etc. I guess its possible something was buggered a few years back too, but I'm just as 100% certain that the RHEL distribution discs contain 100% open-source software (less the binary firmware exception), and we ship SRPMS for *every* package on the distribution discs (including the firmware ones). -- Jarod Wilson jarod-ajLrJawYSntWk0Htik3J/w at public.gmane.org
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |