![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On 09/14/2010 02:49 PM, Dan Ritter wrote: > On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 02:30:11PM -0400, Robert La Ferla wrote: > =20 >> So now I'll refine my question. The servers that we're using are Solar= is and are running various services including Java app servers, NFS, SMTP= , and others.=20 >> >> If a server isn't rebooted on say an annual basis, fsck doesn't get ru= n. Drive mounts that were added but not made permanent won't get remounte= d. Configuration changes and network changes may affect the reboot. Given= this, is it better to never reboot or reboot on a periodic basis.=20 >> =20 > > It is good to never have to reboot. > > It is better to reboot in a controlled situation when you have > time to recover from entropy. > > It is best to have systems automation sufficient to prevent having > temporary drive mounts, unexpected config changes, and so forth. > > -dsr- > > =20 Didn't I just say this :-) --=20 Jerry Feldman <gaf-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org> Boston Linux and Unix PGP key id: 537C5846 PGP Key fingerprint: 3D1B 8377 A3C0 A5F2 ECBB CA3B 4607 4319 537C 5846
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |