Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
This didn't send properly, but Peter already pointed out the Dell article. My comments (copied below) may be relevant if you want to know what I got out of it. Ian On 10/20/10 11:11 AM, Ian Stokes-Rees wrote: I would take a look at this: [1]http://www.delltechcenter.com/page/04-08-2009+-+Nehalem+and+Memory+Configura tions The memory controller is now on the CPU in 5500 series processors. If you just want my interpretation, the short story is: * buy on a per-processor (chip) basis * buy in sets of 3 for maximum bandwidth/speed * populate per-channel, rather than per-bank * fill as few banks as possible (signal speed drop with each additional bank, even if only partly filled) * keep memory uniform on a per-bank basis (e.g. bank 1 has 3x4 GB, bank 2 has 3x2 GB for 18 GB total, each channel has 1x4GB (bank1)and 1x2GB (bank2)), and ideally keep all DIMMs identical. If you have a 2-processor system, then you are going to be buying RAM in blocks of 6. Fastest configuration will be to buy only 6 DIMMs, but DIMMs get expensive past 4GB/stick, so if you need more than 24 GB, you'll pay a premium Ian -- Ian Stokes-Rees, PhD W: [2]http://hkl.hms.harvard.edu [3]ijstokes-/2FeUQLD3jedFdvTe/nMLpVzexx5G7lz at public.gmane.org T: +1 617 432-5608 x75 NEBioGrid, Harvard Medical School C: +1 617 331-5993 References 1. http://www.delltechcenter.com/page/04-08-2009+-+Nehalem+and+Memory+Configurations 2. http://hkl.hms.harvard.edu/ 3. mailto:ijstokes-/2FeUQLD3jedFdvTe/nMLpVzexx5G7lz at public.gmane.org
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |