Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 8:21 PM, <edwardp-mh2Nk+tgbQM at public.gmane.org> wrote: > Bill Bogstad wrote: >> >> Google is your friend.... >> >> https://ata.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Libata_error_messages >> >> says: >> >> ICRC ? ?Interface CRC error during Ultra DMA transfer - often either a >> bad cable or power problem, though possibly an incorrect Ultra DMA >> mode setting by the driver >> > > The ribbon cables are cheap enough. ?ATA/100 ribbon cables would be the > ones to get. > > Since the ATA/133 cables are backwards-compatible to ATA/100, would > there be any advantage to using the 133's, as opposed to 100's? I'm not certain that as far as cables are concerned that there IS any difference between ATA/133 and ATA/100 cables (other then marketing/branding). At least there doesn't seem to be any difference in what people are willing to sell under those labels.... Bill Bogstad
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |