Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

GIT vs. CVS vs. SVN

Subject: GIT vs. CVS vs. SVN
From: greg-SfI3QVg0eaJl57MIdRCFDg at public.gmane.org (Greg Rundlett (freephile))
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 19:48:02 -0500
In-reply-to: <000a01cb8134$625a5200$270ef600$@nedharvey.com>
References: <4CD9AFD4.90808@blu.org> <4CD9B3BA.10602@mattgillen.net> <4CDAACE0.6060905@blu.org> <000a01cb8134$625a5200$270ef600$@nedharvey.com>

All computers need backup.  The fact that users can clone a git repo from
disk to disk is a workalike for rsync.  Git is a better choice for vcs than
CVS or svn because its more capable and performant... it's not about
centralized v. Decentralized because git can do both.

References:
- GIT vs. CVS vs. SVN
  - From: gaf-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org (Jerry Feldman)
- GIT vs. CVS vs. SVN
  - From: me-5yx05kfkO/aqeI1yJSURBw at public.gmane.org (Matthew Gillen)
- GIT vs. CVS vs. SVN
  - From: gaf-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org (Jerry Feldman)
- GIT vs. CVS vs. SVN
  - From: blu-Z8efaSeK1ezqlBn2x/YWAg at public.gmane.org (Edward Ned Harvey)

Prev by Date: Challenge: dump | restore
Next by Date: GIT vs. CVS vs. SVN
Previous by thread: GIT vs. CVS vs. SVN
Next by thread: GIT vs. CVS vs. SVN
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org