![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Richard Pieri noted: > My first guess is that you are running a 32-bit kernel. I haven't had any need a 32-bit kernel since about 2007. The server-build method that I use (PXEboot into an autoyast OpenSuSE 11.3 config) makes that part pretty foolproof. (Before I get into yet more details, let me summarize the symptom: - If I put a single 4GB RAM module in the machine, it sees 4GB. - If I put two 4GB modules into slots 1 & 3, BIOS reports 8GB but Linux (64-bit) sees only 4GB. - If I move the modules to slots 1 & 2, BIOS and Linux both see 8GB (single-channel). - If I put 3 or 4 4GB modules into any combination of slots, BIOS reports correct amount but Linux always reports 8GB. There are never any errors reported, system has been running fine without crashing for weeks and there is nothing flaky.) # uname -a Linux i5lab 2.6.34.7-0.3-desktop #1 SMP PREEMPT 2010-09-20 15:27:38 +0200 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Looking at 'dmesg' output, I can compare this 16GB machine with another that has 8GB. I can't say whether the first few hundred lines of dmesg output contains a clue (nothing obvious); when it gets to summary I see the following: [ 0.000000] Memory: 8172504k/8912896k available (4777k kernel code, 533444k absent, 206948k reserved, 6605k data, 892k init) By comparison, the 8GB machine reports slightly different numbers: [ 0.000000] Memory: 8179700k/9175040k available (4775k kernel code, 788500k absent, 206840k reserved, 6607k data, 896k init) edwardp-mh2Nk+tgbQM at public.gmane.org noted: > My K6-2 motherboard (DFI K6BV3+/66) requires DIMM's that are > double-sided That's a possibility, though the big question mark is why the BIOS splash screen and configuration screens all report the 16GB alive & well. David Kramer asked: > Is it possible you're using one of those video cards that steals > main RAM instead of having its own? Good question. This P55-GD65 mainboard comes with /no/ onboard graphics. At installation time I ventured into my basement and found a 1996-vintage PCI adapter that works well enough to boot the system. When I first saw this RAM problem last month, I fished out a second adapter of a different type and the change had no effect. Jerry Feldman wrote: > The one issue with Rich's system are that the memories are 2 > different speeds. What if Rich reversed the order of the memories. Note that the symptom is basically the same with a single pair of RAM as with two pair. If I put one module on each side of the first dual-channel pair of DIMM slots (1 & 3), the O/S only sees half the available RAM. (Same whether I put in a pair of OCZ or Corsair, and /leave out/ the second pair.) Thanks for all the suggestions! If any of y'all has a favorite mobo for building mid-size servers, let me know and I'll just go out and buy a known-good one instead of continuing to fool around with this one. My home budget doesn't give me what I'd really like (a Dell R710 like the ones at my last workplace, with 18 DIMM slots...;-) Come to think of it, it can be a bit of a pain to configure RAM in those big servers. Even with the Dell cheat-sheets, it takes me 15 to 30 minutes of head-scratching to configure those with anything more than 16GB (they can go to 72GB with 4GB DIMMs, and I think they can take 8GB modules; the most I've done is 48GB). -rich
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |