Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Hi blu, one more sys-admin question... :) I've been having trouble with verizon's domain name servers, so I decided to fire up a caching domain name server. In doing so, I realized that its gotten a bit more complicated since I last performed this task. Mainly, it looks like there is now a secure name service or dnssec which is shipped with rhel6. So I didn't change the default configuration in /etc/named.conf, only to allow named to listen on the local area network and accept queries from my local system. There is a file which defines a bunch of root servers called /var/named/named.ca. So with this setup, I'm assuming I'm skipping over the verizon domain name servers and going directly to the root servers. I then thought I should have my named query the verizon dns servers instead of hitting the root servers and when I did, I got a bunch of the following errors... Nov 29 22:14:42 basement00 named[22831]: error (insecurity proof failed) resolving 'dk.cachefly.net.dlv.isc.org/DLV/IN': 71.242.0.12#53 Nov 29 22:14:42 basement00 named[22831]: validating @0x7f0c9002eab0: dlv.isc.org SOA: got insecure response; parent indicates it should be secure Nov 29 22:14:42 basement00 named[22831]: validating @0x7f0c94014d20: dlv.isc.org SOA: got insecure response; parent indicates it should be secure So, it seems to me that if I am really wanting to use dnssec, then I should removed the forwarder option in named.conf and have my named go straight to the root servers. Some how I feel that this really isn't how I should be setting my named up.... Any comments are greatly appreciated. Cheers. Steve.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |