Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Derek Atkins asked about migrating off VMware Server 2.0. (I used that for a while last year). Check out VirtualBox, as I noted earlier: it directly addresses at least 6 out of 8 questions posted, and it'd be easy to craft scripts and a wrapper page to address the first 2. Matthew Gillen asked for clarification about my benchmark comparing ext4 vs. LVM storage: I'd guess one minor performance penalty of ext4 is its blocksize (4K) vs. that of LVM (4M is default), but that can't be the full explanation for the substantial difference I saw (and that any of y'all should be able to observe). When I create a vm, I always preallocate its storage, and yes, VirtualBox does support the alternative (growable). I wouldn't know anything about ext3-compatbility mode; my ext4 volumes are generated under OpenSuse via 'mkfs -t ext4'. Alas I haven't tried KVM so I can't comment on the comparison with VMware Server (which sux and as noted is end-of-lifed), VMware ESXi (which is solid and high-performing but more of a full-time engineering job to administer, costs money, and doesn't provide a standalone UI), and VirtualBox. -rich
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |