Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 09:53:55AM -0500, Jerry Feldman wrote: > On 12/03/2010 09:39 AM, Dan Ritter wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 07:09:44AM -0500, Chris O'Connell wrote: > >> Hi Dan, > >> > >> I think 4TB should be fine, but would prefer 8. > >> > >> Performance is not an issue, this is simply to archive files. > >> > >> Price... well, I'm willing to spend money on whatever people say is the best > >> recomendation. > >> > >> Physical... something quiet would be nice. And something small. I like the > >> size of the consumer based NAS solutions, they're pretty small... > > I would recommend something like the Acer Aspire Easystore, > > which is an Atom-based PC with four hot-swap SATA slots. > > http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16859321014 > > > > For $330 including the first 2TB disk, it's cheap, small and > > quiet. > > > > I would also rip out the Windows Home Server installation and > > put in my favorite distro, or perhaps FreeNAS. > > > > > I would question the performance of this as a NAS device. While Atom is > an excellent processor, you do need some performance depending on your > needs. The stated case is backup. Gigabit's max is 125MB/s; each disk might be good for 70MB/s. An Atom should be fine. It's likely to be faster than what's in a consumer NAS. -dsr- -- http://tao.merseine.nu/~dsr/eula.html is hereby incorporated by reference. You can't defend freedom by getting rid of it.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |