Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Edward Ned Harvey wrote: > Uggh. Just because I criticize Subversion, don't think I don't have any gripes about git. The commands are roughly divided into "plumbing" (low-level) and "porcelain" (higher-level). On that analogy, I am looking forward to someone building a full-featured "bathroom": A GUI that goes well beyond gitk and gitg, both in offering rich and complete views into a repository, but also being complete in manipulating it, and in helping teach how what it does correlates with the command line. Recently I saw an online video of Linus showing us all kinds of nifty things, like powerful ways to see how to see how an apparently complicated git merge conflict can actually be pretty simple and how to find out. Unfortunately the cameracritter thought we wanted to see his face and didn't show the examples he was typing. The result was frustration. It seemed emblematic of the state of git: Tons of power, to do new things we haven't thought about much before now (and so don't much understand), obscurely packaged. -kb
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |