Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On 01/12/2011 02:52 AM, jc-8FIgwK2HfyJMuWfdjsoA/w at public.gmane.org wrote: > Derek Martin wrote: > | On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 05:58:24PM -0500, Rob Hasselbaum wrote: > | > On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 1:40 PM, David Rosenstrauch <darose at darose.= net>wrote: > | > > I think this depends a lot on the company. IMO, you find this a = lot at > | > > large, established companies. (e.g., I used to find this a lot a= t Wall > | > > St. banks.) > | [...] > | > I second that assessment. > | > | I basically agree, but... > | > | > As someone who looks at a lot of resumes, I sometimes get frustrate= d > | > if a candidate with a lot of experience buries me in 5 pages of > | > details about work that is only loosely related to the position I'm= > | > trying to fill. > | > | This makes me cringe. I agree in principle that tailoring your resum= e > | is a good idea, but... Have you actually read any significant number= > | of job postings on the internet? A lot of them are sufficiently vagu= e > | that even if you wanted to tailor your resume, it's not exactly easy,= > | especially when you do have many years of varied experience, a lot of= > | which is very likely to be unrelated to the job you're applying for. > | ... > > Something I learned a couple of decades ago is that when you see the > common set of job requirements that's a list of specific thing you > must be an expert with, it usually means that the hiring managers > have already decided who they'll hire, but are required to do a > credible search for the best candidate. So they write up the > requirements to match the exact background of the already-chosen > hiree, hoping that no applicants will match ALL of the precise > "requirements". It's an old game. > > I've gone to a number of interviews in the past few years for jobs > like this, knowing that I didn't match their requirements exactly, > but could probably learn the rest in a few days. In every case, the > made it clear that I wasn't qualified, and shouldn't have replied to > their job posting. > > OTOH, one of the standard arguments for tailoring your resume to a > job description is the old problem of being "overqualified". That > really means that they won't hire someone who has ever worked on a > job different than the one they've advertised. Again, this is often > because they've decided who they want to hire, are willing to do a > bit of training, and want someone with little experience so they > won't cost too much. In this case, tailoring your resume is a way of > hiding your "overqualification" so they'll hire you. > > I wonder if the Game Theory people have tackled this topic ... > I've been fortunate enough over the past few years to have a job. In the past I would tailor my resume to emphasize some of the skills for specific jobs, but I have never stated anything falsely. There were a few jobs I got that I was not qualified for, but I learned on the job and that was ok. When I was between contracts a few years ago I attended a few WIND meetings. Some of the things they did at WIND were useful, such as elevator speeches. But, the main way a lot of people get jobs today is networking. But, the main thing you need to be able to do is to sell yourself, and your resume is important, and the most important part is the top 3rd of the first page. I've been a hiring manager, and reading resumes is a chore for a techie. One good guy I hired actually called us to interview us and I thought he was a headhunter initially. We hired him and IMHO it was a good hire. More recently I worked for him for about a year at Polaroid. And what Chambers says is true too, where sometimes they interview people but have 1 person in mind. --=20 Jerry Feldman <gaf-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org> Boston Linux and Unix PGP key id: 537C5846 PGP Key fingerprint: 3D1B 8377 A3C0 A5F2 ECBB CA3B 4607 4319 537C 5846 _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |