Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Daniel Feenberg <feenberg-fCu/yNAGv6M at public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, 17 Jan 2011, Rich Braun wrote: > > > > > All the above problems were solved at a very similar per-port price point > > ($300 give or take) using Dell DRAC or HP ILO cards. Someone already > pointed > > out the negative of that solution: you have to build out a separate > physical > > LAN, at a cost of about $20-50 per port for cables and switches plus > labor. > > Why do you have to have a separate physical LAN? We have some HP and SUN > ILO devices (on the motherboards) and connect them to LAN ports on the > same switches as the main OS uses and in the same VLAN. The ILO software > does not appear to be particularly insecure, logins and passwords - indeed > whole sessions are encrypted. > > > But the upside of that is you get to create separate DNS entries for > every > > console, which makes things vastly easier to manage if you've got more > than a > > few dozen servers. > > > > -rich > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Discuss mailing list > > Discuss-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org > > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > For small networks it may not matter, or it may be trying to keep costs down. But as you get larger you want to keep your remote management/access network separate from your production traffic. -matt
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |