![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On 01/22/2011 03:32 PM, Jerry Feldman wrote: > On 01/22/2011 03:21 PM, Mark Komarinski wrote: >> On 1/22/2011 10:30 AM, Jerry Feldman wrote: >>> Yesterday at work, one of my coworkers wanted to make a presentation >>> from his company laptop (Windows XP). For some reason his IP address was >>> showing 192.168.x.x, not the internal company 10. address. I used my >>> Ubuntu netbook to make sure the CAT5E cable was ok, and I certainly got >>> a valid 10. address. We moved to another office because the lighting was >>> better, and the same thing. We even rebooted his computer. Somehow it >>> wanted to remain at 192.168. Our cables are plugged directly into a >>> switch that plugs into our firewall. After a while we finally got the >>> thing up and running on the corporate network. Note that I had even done >>> a IPCONFIG /release and IPCONFIG /renew. I've seen this before on his >>> previous laptop. Apparently he does something at home, but when I look >>> at properties it shows DHCP. >>> >> Use ipconfig /all to verify that a lease is actually getting assigned. >> If it is, you may have a rogue DHCP server on your hands. > This has happened before on his previous laptop. I think it has to do > with the way he configured it. No one else has the same problem. OK, here's a crazy theory. Windows sometimes tries to "bridge" ethernet devices so they look as one device, whether you're using wireless or wired. Maybe it does this via its own nat?
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |