aureport on fedora 10 64-bit vs 12 64-bit

[gaf-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org (Jerry Feldman)]

On 02/20/2011 06:57 AM, Scott Ehrlich wrote:
> I have found that if I run, for example, aureport --summary -ts today
> -te today on a repeated basis (testing, for example) on an F10 system,
> the correct results are repeated.  But, if I try it repeatedly on an
> F12 system, the correct results appear to be accurate the first time,
> then reset to 0 subsequent times.
>
> Why does F10 remember the summary and F12 appears to clear out the
> results after the first run?   Where are the details collected from
> and stored?  I presume /var/log/*?  But why does one remember the
> settings and the other appear to cache the results?
>
> I'm been trying to learn more about how aureport works.  F10 is great
> in actively showing me every change - updated summaries and login
> attempts, and it remembers the results every time I request them.
> F12 does not seem to capture new login attempts immediately, for
> either login query or summary query.   Why is F12 apparently slower or
> simply more finicky than F10?
Seems to work correctly on F14.

--=20
Jerry Feldman <gaf-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org>
Boston Linux and Unix
PGP key id: 537C5846
PGP Key fingerprint: 3D1B 8377 A3C0 A5F2 ECBB  CA3B 4607 4319 537C 5846



_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss