Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
I was looking into setting up a time machine backup disk for the macs in the house. There appear to be hundreds of USB2.0 external devices which transfer at a rate of ... USB 1.0 2mbps USB 2.0 Full Speed 12mbps USB 2.0 High Speed 480mbps USB 3.0 5 gbps I am seeing USB 2.0 all over the place, but few references to Full versus High Speed. I don't know how common one is versus the other. If one wants the ethernet port, the device becomes a Network Attached Storage (NAS). I have 100base-T Ethernet in the house, along with 802.11n. Those should provide 100mbps connections to a NAS. Western Digital My Book Live sells a 1TB for $130 or 2TB for $150. I would think that when you wanted to get something off these disks, NAS might make a significant difference if it is 12 versus 100, unless one has the High Speed USB which would win in that case (unless the disk is limiting somewhere in this range). One thing that bothers me about either setup is having these things on all the time. Does anyone sell a device that wakes up when needed? If you had the choice between a USB backup or NAS at home, which would you prefer? Should I even worry about the speed differences for this one kind of task? Doug
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |