Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 09:40:15AM -0400, Jerry Feldman wrote: > I will be running 2 wireless routers in my office configured as > switches. All security will be identical. The question is SSID. Should I > configure the second wireless as the same SSID as the first, or not. > For example, the SSID of the first is FuBar, and the second is either > FuBar or FuBar1. It does not matter which wireless one of our employees > connects to. > > The advantage of using the same SSID is that possibly some wireless > settings on phones and PCs will connect automatically where if it is a > different SSID it may require the encryption key to be entered, which is > a pain with Smartphones. Some wireless points support roaming, some don't. Sometimes it comes down to specific firmware revisions. If they do support roaming, you need all of them to be using the same SSID (and all encryption keys, etc.) though not necessarily the same channel. It is certainly more convenient if people move between zones frequently; it is not much more convenient if your smartphones and so forth remember encryption keys per network. -dsr- -- http://tao.merseine.nu/~dsr/eula.html is hereby incorporated by reference. You can't fight for freedom by taking away rights.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |