BLU Discuss list archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Discuss] Relevance of PGP?

Subject: [Discuss] Relevance of PGP?
From: bill.n1vux at gmail.com (Bill Ricker)
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 21:21:17 -0400
In-reply-to: <FB987BB2-73C0-4BBC-ADEA-5816485A8942@comcast.net>
References: <BANLkTi=rH1vLCPpgO+cjCrt21XAsuUfe5Q@mail.gmail.com> <000401cc2767$b41595d0$1c40c170$@nedharvey.com> <BANLkTikqAn8XoMc4mzkteUtoEWxh_39PcQ@mail.gmail.com> <000101cc2839$7a487e80$6ed97b80$@nedharvey.com> <BANLkTi=U0MRiGSKpmhW2C3gLfiQ-iS_FSA@mail.gmail.com> <D592B5C6-84F4-4B88-BB8F-A67BD6D1FD85@comcast.net> <BANLkTikU31dZXtSq1EAZhAZ6NCdNJohuSA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+h9Qs56VjkPzmtttgfeGRY=Dvh7bD4JieUWU-rbQz1on=JdLA@mail.gmail.com> <FB987BB2-73C0-4BBC-ADEA-5816485A8942@comcast.net>

>
> easier for end users, ... and not cost money?


That would be nice! And it would be even nice if the nice person doing all
that for free managed not to compromise security while doing it, but that's
rather less likely. "Easy, Secure, Free, pick two" isn't guaranteed the way
quick, good, cheap - pick two is, but ...

-- 
Bill
@n1vux bill.n1vux at gmail.com

Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Relevance of PGP?
  - From: blu at nedharvey.com (Edward Ned Harvey)
- [Discuss] Relevance of PGP?
  - From: agabrielson1 at comcast.net (Anthony Gabrielson)

References:
- [Discuss] Fwd: Relevance of PGP?
  - From: jabr at blu.org (John Abreau)
- [Discuss] Relevance of PGP?
  - From: agabrielson1 at comcast.net (Anthony Gabrielson)

Prev by Date: [Discuss] Relevance of PGP?
Next by Date: [Discuss] Relevance of PGP?
Previous by thread: [Discuss] Relevance of PGP?
Next by thread: [Discuss] Relevance of PGP?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org