Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Edward Ned Harvey <blu at nedharvey.com> writes: >> From: discuss-bounces+blu=nedharvey.com at blu.org [mailto:discuss- >> bounces+blu=nedharvey.com at blu.org] On Behalf Of Derek Atkins >> >> Personally I've never encrypted my laptops before, but I started >> encrypting my current one. There is definitely a performance hit when >> doing large data movements (it took me much longer to copy my homedir >> from my old disk to the new encrypted disk) but I don't notice a >> significant performance degredation in my everyday usage. > > What are you using? Both in terms of hardware, and encryption tool? > Because I don't have a performance hit... In various situations, on various > types of hardware, using various encryption tools... Dell Laptop (E6420) using Fedora's default-install dm-crypt configuration. The performance hit was in how long it took to copy ~300GB of data from a USB (or eSata) drive. When I did a similar copy on an unencrypted ThinkPad it took a fraction of the time that it took to copy it on the encrypted Dell. Same Data. The only differences were the ThinkPad v. Dell, and encrypted v. non-encrypted. Even the copy method was using the same, on the same base OS. I just dont recall if I had upgraded to 2.6.40 before or after copying all the data.... -derek -- Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB) URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH warlord at MIT.EDU PGP key available
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |