Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Derek Atkins asked: > Okay, why did you do this instead of using something like Gallery2? > http://gallery.menalto.com/ A further thought after browsing Gallery's docs some more and looking at some examples: I get the impression that Gallery is aimed at managing a (usually small) set of related photos, like a single album or possibly a set of related albums, and their presentation to the audience. I would set up Gallery on a site to display those particular photos and, as needed, edit or annotate them. Other photos would be in other Gallery sites. At home I'd have my entire collection of photos stored and backed up. My app manages my entire collection of photos, currently about 75,000, primarily so I can conveniently look them up, edit them, annotate them, back them up and, once in a while, select a few for an album to share. My photo collection also functions as my memory (an aspect that gets more and more handy as I age) and a reference for "what happened when where" lookups. I do a lot more with my photos than publish the occasional album. Since it's a web app, everyone in the household can look up photos as well. Ted
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |