Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On 09/18/2011 11:29 AM, Daniel Feenberg wrote: > > We are in the midst of licensing the SAS software product for a server. > This is an extremely expensive product, and the charge for a quad-core > machine is tens of thousands of dollars more than for a dual-core > machine. If you are unfamiliar with SAS, it does lots of sequential I/O > and is rarely CPU bound. So we are looking to put together a high > performance machine that uses only a dual-core processor. I know that > dual-core is now usually very low-end (or laptop) but creative > suggestions are welcome. Ideally we would like PCI-e slots for SAS or > SATA controllers so that we can have a lot of fast local storage. Would it be out of the question performance-wise to just get a good modern quad-core, and run SAS in a single-core bare-bones VM? I haven't done any benchmarking of disk-IO intensive loads within VMs, so I don't really know what the overhead is (everyone seems to care much more about the CPU-usage overhead). Matt
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |