BLU Discuss list archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Discuss] A really interesting chain of functionality

Subject: [Discuss] A really interesting chain of functionality
From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 14:39:31 -0400
In-reply-to: <4E7F4B79.7040905@code-energy.com>
References: <4E7E9851.5090906@mohawksoft.com> <000001cc7b92$66bd85c0$34389140$@nedharvey.com> <4E7F4B79.7040905@code-energy.com>

On Sep 25, 2011, at 11:40 AM, Cole Tuininga wrote:
> 
> Could you elaborate?  As somebody who is only passingly familiar with
> this level of things, I'm curious to learn what makes LVM's snapshot so
> terrible.

Write performance drops through the floor the moment that an LVM snapshot is enabled, anywhere from 5 to 30 times worse.

--Rich P.

References:
- [Discuss] A really interesting chain of functionality
  - From: markw at mohawksoft.com (Mark Woodward)
- [Discuss] A really interesting chain of functionality
  - From: blu at nedharvey.com (Edward Ned Harvey)
- [Discuss] A really interesting chain of functionality
  - From: colet at code-energy.com (Cole Tuininga)

Prev by Date: [Discuss] A really interesting chain of functionality
Next by Date: [Discuss] A really interesting chain of functionality
Previous by thread: [Discuss] A really interesting chain of functionality
Next by thread: [Discuss] A really interesting chain of functionality
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread


BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org