Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 08:42:42AM -0700, Hsuan-Yeh Chang wrote: > 1.? To me, trying to convince the Congress to get rid of software > patents is no less crazier than my suggestions. It isn't: Your suggestion goes against both logic and human nature. There will always be a small contingency of engineers who will go through the trouble to get patents due to some idealism or entrepreneurial leanings; but most engineers will do a simple cost-benefit analysis (probably without realizing they are doing it) and dismiss the idea immediately, IF it even occurs to them they have a patentable idea (RMS touches on this also). The percentage of exceptions will always be very small, because the cost is high and the benefits are minimal to an individual patent holder. By contrast, there's already a substantial contingency of both individuals AND businesses that want software patents abolished. That merely needs to reach critical mass to make it happen. Change is effected on a small scale in this country in this fashion all the time; there are numerous well-known examples of it happening throughout U.S. history on a nationwide basis (slavery, women's sufferage, racism reform, etc.). Neither thing is easy, but getting congress to change the law is much easier than battling human nature. -- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail due to spam prevention. Sorry for the inconvenience.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |