Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:10:58PM -0700, Hsuan-Yeh Chang wrote: > I also think you miss my point.? No one misses your point... your point is impractical and essentially useless. In the video, RMS points out that an independent study was done on the Linux kernel, and a researcher determined that it contained approximately 284 patent violations. This is ONE PROGRAM. Note that the overwhelming majority of features in the kernel have existed in one form or another predating the USPTO's acceptance of patent applications for software. Had we filed patents for all of these 284 things, that's nearly $60,000 in patent fees, just for the application fee for each one, not counting the time to write the application or the cash to hire a knowledgeable lawyer to do it. That's for ONE PROGRAM, written mostly by college students, for which there is NO REVENUE. For ideas which mostly are blatantly obvious, to anyone reasonably educated in the field. Your suggestion that we do this for everything that we write is asinine. The funds for this simply do not exist, even if we wanted to file them. And again, practically speaking, we don't have the resources to defend such patents, so in practice they are worthless. -- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail due to spam prevention. Sorry for the inconvenience.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |