Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Discuss] (OT) Steve Jobs 1955-2011



On 10/06/2011 11:07 AM, Ben Eisenbraun wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 10:19:49AM -0400, Matthew Gillen wrote:
>> On 10/06/2011 09:23 AM, Dan O'Donovan wrote:
>>>> My next cell phone will be an openmoko
>>>
>>> I remember saying that five years ago - kinda glad I got an iPhone now...
>>
>> I will never buy one of those.  The way they treat jailbreakers (sue
>> them for copyright infringement, brick their phones)
>
> I call bullshit. A cursory Google doesn't return any hits for Apple suing
> people who jailbreak their phones, and I doubt you'll find _any_ reliable
> reference saying that they are deliberately bricking jailbroken phones with
> their updates.
>
> So, references please.

Bricking iPhones:
http://www.applegazette.com/iphone/apple-says-it-may-brick-unlocked-iphones-with-next-software-update/
http://gizmodo.com/303171/apple-says-unlocked-iphones-will-brick-after-software-update-+-what-does-it-mean
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9039479/Update_Apple_plays_hardball_Upgrade_bricks_unlocked_iPhones

It's hard to "prove" intent without getting court orders to uncover 
internal emails and memos and such (sorry, I just don't have the 
resources to up against Apple's legal dept.), but the statement from 
Apple in the first link is clearly a warning.  It doesn't take Columbo 
to make the connection.

Suing jailbreakers: first google hit:
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/02/apple-says-jailbreaking-illegal

They didn't actually file any lawsuits, but made claims that they would, 
until the Copyright Office slapped their hand (thanks to the EFF!):
  http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-20011661-38.html

Even if they didn't get around to filing any suits (during the short 
time they could before the Copyright Office completely nullified Apple's 
claims), it doesn't sit well with me that they were even making the 
threats.  Seems awfully petty to me...

On 10/06/2011 11:49 PM, David Kramer wrote:
> Anyone who is surprised when their Apple device isn't as flexible as
> its competitors or becomes obsolete in months is not paying
> attention.  But if that mindset doesn't work for you, don't buy an
> Apple.

On 10/07/2011 12:37 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
> if I didn't care about hackability, I'd totally say it's a great
> choice, which it is for end consumers who just don't care. Consumers
> don't care about whether your phone is blessed by Stallman, but they
> do care if they can make telephone calls with it reliably (antenna
> notwithstanding).

As David and Jon point out, my real beef is with hackability.  I'm not 
saying my phone has to blessed by Stallman, but the hostility to the 
jailbreak community really turns me off, because of the implications 
about control and (non-)hackability.

Google has been pretty agnostic as far as I can tell about rooting, and 
at least one major android phone manufacturer (HTC) has said they will 
no longer use locked bootloaders (so as to be more hacker-friendly):
http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/26/htc-officially-dissolves-locked-bootlader-policy/
http://hothardware.com/News/HTC-Kills-Bootloader-Lock-Policy/

So in my book, android gets a win for a more diverse community (Android 
has many hardware manufacturers, therefore it is more likely that there 
are some that have a clue / are hacker-friendly).  It's also harder to 
control (i.e., by google), which gives the anti-authoritarian in me warm 
fuzzies (I fully anticipate a fork of Android in the future, a la Oracle 
spinning off their own brand of RHEL, although hopefully a fork of 
android would be more productive for the community than Oracle is with 
their RHEL ripoff).

To those that say "well, at least Apple doesn't collect all my 
information", I have one word for you: iCloud.   ;-)

Finally, just so people don't belabor the point, yes, I fully 
acknowledge that I'm not a "typical" customer, and that for people who 
just want something that looks pretty and "just works" (for the set of 
activities that Apple has approved of), I'm sure the iPhone is a 
perfectly viable choice.

Matt



BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org