Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On 10/06/2011 11:07 AM, Ben Eisenbraun wrote: > On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 10:19:49AM -0400, Matthew Gillen wrote: >> On 10/06/2011 09:23 AM, Dan O'Donovan wrote: >>>> My next cell phone will be an openmoko >>> >>> I remember saying that five years ago - kinda glad I got an iPhone now... >> >> I will never buy one of those. The way they treat jailbreakers (sue >> them for copyright infringement, brick their phones) > > I call bullshit. A cursory Google doesn't return any hits for Apple suing > people who jailbreak their phones, and I doubt you'll find _any_ reliable > reference saying that they are deliberately bricking jailbroken phones with > their updates. > > So, references please. Bricking iPhones: http://www.applegazette.com/iphone/apple-says-it-may-brick-unlocked-iphones-with-next-software-update/ http://gizmodo.com/303171/apple-says-unlocked-iphones-will-brick-after-software-update-+-what-does-it-mean http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9039479/Update_Apple_plays_hardball_Upgrade_bricks_unlocked_iPhones It's hard to "prove" intent without getting court orders to uncover internal emails and memos and such (sorry, I just don't have the resources to up against Apple's legal dept.), but the statement from Apple in the first link is clearly a warning. It doesn't take Columbo to make the connection. Suing jailbreakers: first google hit: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/02/apple-says-jailbreaking-illegal They didn't actually file any lawsuits, but made claims that they would, until the Copyright Office slapped their hand (thanks to the EFF!): http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-20011661-38.html Even if they didn't get around to filing any suits (during the short time they could before the Copyright Office completely nullified Apple's claims), it doesn't sit well with me that they were even making the threats. Seems awfully petty to me... On 10/06/2011 11:49 PM, David Kramer wrote: > Anyone who is surprised when their Apple device isn't as flexible as > its competitors or becomes obsolete in months is not paying > attention. But if that mindset doesn't work for you, don't buy an > Apple. On 10/07/2011 12:37 AM, Jon Masters wrote: > if I didn't care about hackability, I'd totally say it's a great > choice, which it is for end consumers who just don't care. Consumers > don't care about whether your phone is blessed by Stallman, but they > do care if they can make telephone calls with it reliably (antenna > notwithstanding). As David and Jon point out, my real beef is with hackability. I'm not saying my phone has to blessed by Stallman, but the hostility to the jailbreak community really turns me off, because of the implications about control and (non-)hackability. Google has been pretty agnostic as far as I can tell about rooting, and at least one major android phone manufacturer (HTC) has said they will no longer use locked bootloaders (so as to be more hacker-friendly): http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/26/htc-officially-dissolves-locked-bootlader-policy/ http://hothardware.com/News/HTC-Kills-Bootloader-Lock-Policy/ So in my book, android gets a win for a more diverse community (Android has many hardware manufacturers, therefore it is more likely that there are some that have a clue / are hacker-friendly). It's also harder to control (i.e., by google), which gives the anti-authoritarian in me warm fuzzies (I fully anticipate a fork of Android in the future, a la Oracle spinning off their own brand of RHEL, although hopefully a fork of android would be more productive for the community than Oracle is with their RHEL ripoff). To those that say "well, at least Apple doesn't collect all my information", I have one word for you: iCloud. ;-) Finally, just so people don't belabor the point, yes, I fully acknowledge that I'm not a "typical" customer, and that for people who just want something that looks pretty and "just works" (for the set of activities that Apple has approved of), I'm sure the iPhone is a perfectly viable choice. Matt
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |