Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
> From: discuss-bounces+blu=nedharvey.com at blu.org [mailto:discuss- > bounces+blu=nedharvey.com at blu.org] On Behalf Of Kyle Leslie > > Hola Everyone. With the recent talk about PGP and the growing need for its > use at my company I have been trying to learn about it. I'll encourage you to look at S/MIME instead. It's much easier. Surely some people on this list will say PGP is more secure, and as with anything, there's a grain of truth which is probably not represented entirely accurately. The fundamental difference is this: S/MIME is based on SSL, which means anything you send/receive is automatically checked for validity using the built-in SSL root Trusts. These are the same organizations that are used to trust https traffic, or anything else based on SSL. So the grain of truth is like this: As long as you're trusting a 3rd party such as verisign or thawte, then there's an attack vector which otherwise doesn't exist. An attacker only needs to somehow compromise one of these root trusts, and then they can forge signatures. Although rare, this has been known to happen. When it happens, the compromised certificate authority promptly revokes any compromised certs (as soon as they discover they've been compromised)... So it's important to keep current with system updates. On the flip side, with PGP you don't have automatic trusts. You need to somehow decide you trust someone's cert based on some kind of out-of-band information. Maybe because the person told you over the phone "I'm sending it now" and then it arrived a second later, or whatever. The problem with something like this is... Just like the "Are you sure?" prompts that you get everytime you try to do anything in windows... People just make a habit of always clicking "Yes" without thinking about it. Everyone has their own opinions, about which is more trustworthy and which is more convenient. My opinion is that if you're deploying one of these technologies for your company, IMHO your users would be more secure with S/MIME, and it's much more convenient. If you were only deploying it for yourself, then you as an interested and technical user might actually get better security out of PGP. You can get free S/MIME certs from startssl.com, and probably a number of other locations. If you're interested, I have an example here: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/543241/Digital%20ID%20Step%201%20-%20Create%20Cert%2 0IE9%20Win7.pdf and http://dl.dropbox.com/u/543241/Digital%20ID%20Step%202%20-%20Outlook%202010. pdf
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |