Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On 10/22/2011 08:55 AM, markw at mohawksoft.com wrote: > I'm looking to hear from people using it, things they like, things they > dislike, oddities they've encountered, etc. Only negative I've heard is: If you have a logical volume that spans multiple HDD's, and one of the disks goes bad, the file system on your LV will be corrupted/lost. (I think this is similar to RAID-0?) So, IIRC, currently best practice is that if your goal is to make a large volume group made up of several physical volumes, that the physical volumes should be redundant RAID devices themselves to avoid this problem. Perhaps someone else can confirm/refute this? HTH, DR
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |