Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Oct 24, 2011, at 10:42 PM, markw at mohawksoft.com wrote: > > I can't understand your perspective here. We have various RAID drivers, we > have linear drivers, sparse volumes, encrypted volumes, and so on. All > implemented at the block device level. Then let me paraphrase it: LVM is a logical partition manager. > How are snapshots any more or less complex or problematic than a RAID5 or > encrypted block device? Practical example: create your "master" volume (partition) with 1TB. Create a snapshot of the master, call it "a" and give it 100GB. Create another snapshot of the master, call it "b" and give it 1GB. The snapshots are created such that a does COW against master and b is mostly pointers to volume a's blocks so that you don't have the duplicated blocks. Now, delete volume a. Or copy 100GB+1byte to volume a. This will trigger LVM's reaper which prunes the snapshot to ensure that there is no data loss on master. --Rich P.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |