BLU Discuss list archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Discuss] LVM Snapshot Wrapup

Subject: [Discuss] LVM Snapshot Wrapup
From: markw at mohawksoft.com (markw at mohawksoft.com)
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 09:06:42 -0400
In-reply-to: <000f01cc9894$c73d8020$55b88060$@nedharvey.com>
References: <2a2b42cfdec11f413d82ab8bec2718c8.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com> <000f01cc9894$c73d8020$55b88060$@nedharvey.com>

>> From: discuss-bounces+blu=nedharvey.com at blu.org [mailto:discuss-
>> bounces+blu=nedharvey.com at blu.org] On Behalf Of
>>
>> ZFS has license issues.
>> Btrfs not considered "stable" yet.
>
> I don't recall you ever expanding into what you mean by saying those 2
> things.
>
ZFS:
http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2010/06/uptake-of-native-linux-zfs-port-hampered-by-license-conflict.ars

Btrfs:
Doesn't have a completely functional fsck yet, and still has performance
issues. It is still not considered "stable" yet with regard to the kernel.

>

Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] LVM Snapshot Wrapup
  - From: blu at nedharvey.com (Edward Ned Harvey)

References:
- [Discuss] LVM Snapshot Wrapup
  - From: blu at nedharvey.com (Edward Ned Harvey)

Prev by Date: [Discuss] Virtual hosting provider (me too)
Next by Date: [Discuss] Real SATA RAID controllers?
Previous by thread: [Discuss] LVM Snapshot Wrapup
Next by thread: [Discuss] LVM Snapshot Wrapup
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread


BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org