Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On 11/6/2011 7:47 AM, Stephen Adler wrote: > I've recently read a news article which talked about Foxconn and their > supposed abusive labour practices. Foxconn is the maker of a lot of > popular electronics including the iPhone. > > This got me thinking, when I go off an buy a motherboard or memory > SIMM or whatever, am I buying a product which has been manufactured by > laborers who work under conditions I wouldn't allow my own family to > work under? Is there any awarness campain or whatever which allows one > to buy some electronic component which was manufactured in conditions > which meet some kind of labor standards? On my part, I would pay more > for my electronic components if I new they were being manufactured > using a by someone who's working under good conditions, not sweat shop > like conditions. Am I being too paranoid about this in the sense that > labor conditions in China are just fine and the workers are well paid > and not over worked? I'm not a Sociologist, but I will caution against making what those in that profession call a "Fundamental Attribution Error": the distortion that comes from taking an event or a paradigm out of its surrounding societal context, and examining it by rules that don't apply in the place where it occurs. Take, for example, the heart-rending pictures of starving children which are pushed in our faces on television, along with entreaties to send money made by carefully manicured and kindly-looking actors who promise to help. The Kleptocrats who rule the lands where those children live know that if the children stop starving, that the money will stop coming. They like the money just fine, and they know that western idealism and (let's be frank) gullibility will assure that a continuous river of gold will flow into their Swiss bank accounts so long as they assure a continuous river of refugees. To them, the choice is so obvious as to be insulting: a few children against the river of gold. By our standards, an atrocity; by theirs, common sense. There is, IMNSHO, no mystery to the success America has enjoyed in the past fifty years: our nation had bombed our opponents' factories back to the stone age in World War II, and had, in the process, killed millions of the men who would have worked in those factories, and most of the men who could have led them. The aftermath was a period of peace and prosperity that allowed us to lull ourselves into a sense of (again, frankly) moral superiority that compensates for the ghosts of those millions, for the terrible and necessary choices and the terrible and inevitable consequences our fathers made and suffered. My father was a Marine who had been shot on Guadalcanal, and who had what the government called a "/Psychosomatic/ /disorder/": what was once known as shell shock and is now called Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. He wasn't a nice guy to live with: he raised eight kids on a plumbers wages and tried to drink away the ghosts of those who had stayed on the canal. We all live with those ghosts: we all enjoy the gifts their deaths left for us. We all, most of the time, have the luxury of judging other nations and other people by a code of morality that simply does not apply in those places or to those people. What I mean is that we are prone to judging others by a set of rules that we can afford and they cannot. We are a nation of warriors, and prone to the short-sightedness that comes from wars: the winner-take-all economic system, the tolerance of diseases which decimate older men but don't affect those of military age, the craving for simple answers and direct action, and, most importantly, the willingness to take advantage of other people who don't have guns. I was a soldier in Vietnam, and although I did not fall into my father's bottle, in a way, I have PTSD: I am always careful not to apply American ideas of "right" or "wrong" to places or people who would think me a fool for doing so. I cannot escape the knowledge that neither enemies nor economics forgive wishful thinking. I do not contribute to "famine relief" efforts for the starving children of Africa, or concern myself with working conditions in the thousands of factories around the pacific rim where the natives labor to provide me with cheap laptops, fancy "smart" phones, or the integrated circuits which dot the landscape of our cars, our computers, our TV's, and our moral universe. I made a choice that the best thing I can do to help famine victims in Africa is to walk away with clean hands: if Mandela proved anything, it is that only Africans can solve the problems of Africa. If the working conditions around the pacific rim prove anything, it is that the leaders of the nations where those conditions prevail are led by hard-headed realists who do not choose to pretend that the United States' code of morality can or should apply - who see us an an aging nation of warriors who will, in due course, give way to more patient and more disciplined peoples who beat their spears into the pruning hooks they now use to gather the low-hanging fruit of Americans' love affair with electronic toys . They know that things will change in time - maybe as little as one hundred years - and they are willing, in fact eager, to sacrifice the lives of peasants /now/ in return for the continued welfare of their nations /then/. I prefer to keep my charity and my conscience close, so when Christmas comes, I take a Fifty-dollar bill and I give it to the Campesino who rides the trash truck in front of my home, and another to the Spanish-speaking girl who cleans the tables at my favorite restaurant. The cost-of-overhead is zero, the effectiveness immediate, and the money is put to use in my local community without delay. I suggest, with all due respect, that your time and money would be better spent solving problems /here/, in the communities of poorly-paid and disadvantaged people /here. /If you need to use a computer keyboard made in a foreign nation to affect change at home, please rest assured that the leaders of those nations are aware of the risks that your keyboard will come back to bite them, and made the trade with a clear conscience. Bill Copyright (C) 2011 E. William Horne. All Rights Reserved. -- Bill Horne 339-364-8487
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |