Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Tom Metro <tmetro-blu at vl.com> wrote: > Rich Braun wrote: >> On an impulse, I bought a wifi router at Microcenter a few days ago, >> thinking that heck for $25 I wouldn't mind have an upgrade from "g" >> to "n". >> >> * The vendor supplies full GPL source code on its website >> * It's on the OpenWRT hardware compatibility list > > About 2 years ago I applied the same reasoning to buying a TRENDnet > TEW-652BRP at Micro Center. > Interesting. I have had that same model on my home network for about the same time with no problems. It also replaced a WRT54G. I didn't see any speed increases either, but I didn't even have any 802.11n clients at the time. One possible reason for different experiences is that TRENDnet used that model number for two completely different hardware versions. I have the V2 hardware with the 2.00.22 firmware revision. While the V1 hardware is supported by alternative firmwares, the V2 hardware does not. It is just too different. I had originally bought it for experimentation purposes and I didn't know there were two different hardware versions. TRENDnet does provide source code for at least some of their binary releases and I was able to compile a new version from source which allowed me to login via telnet. In the end, I changed directions and used my WRT54G for the experiment and the TEW-652BRP has been my home network's gateway with stock firmware ever since. I also have 4 or 5 TRENDnet gigabit dumb switches (5/8 port). So far, I have had one problem which seemed to be caused by one of the switches. I reconfigured my network to remove that switch and the problem went away. I'm not 100% sure the switch went bad (rather then a cable problem), but I lean towards it being the switch at this point. Bill Bogstad
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |