BLU Discuss list archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Discuss] box.net

Subject: [Discuss] box.net
From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 11:59:00 -0500
In-reply-to: <20120105165629.GS1641@tao.merseine.nu>
References: <000001cccaec$553c4e90$ffb4ebb0$@nedharvey.com> <4F055DD5.60904@vl.com> <000201cccbc1$a753dec0$f5fb9c40$@nedharvey.com> <D6779AFE-A477-454E-9EE2-4BAD88577B9B@gmail.com> <20120105165629.GS1641@tao.merseine.nu>

On Jan 5, 2012, at 11:56 AM, Dan Ritter wrote:
> 
>> Because the plus sign screws up their SQL queries.
> 
> Which would be indicative of far worse problems.

This is news?

--Rich P.

References:
- [Discuss] box.net
  - From: blu at nedharvey.com (Edward Ned Harvey)
- [Discuss] box.net
  - From: tmetro-blu at vl.com (Tom Metro)
- [Discuss] box.net
  - From: blu at nedharvey.com (Edward Ned Harvey)
- [Discuss] box.net
  - From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] box.net
  - From: dsr at tao.merseine.nu (Dan Ritter)

Prev by Date: [Discuss] box.net
Next by Date: [Discuss] [OT] Microsoft's Standalone System Sweeper
Previous by thread: [Discuss] box.net
Next by thread: [Discuss] box.net
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread


BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org